When I was in the hospital lying in the ICU I was later
told that during that time I was 50/50 of living/dying. I find that fascinating. During this time in ICU I had no clue what
was happening. No one told me and I suspect
that I was drugged much of the time that this was happening, I don’t know. So anyways I’m lying there whether unconscious
or not I had no clue that I might die.
Interesting. Makes you wonder
about life and death.
Life, what is it?
I’m sure Biologists have a definition of it and I’ll look it up and add
it to this post:
Ok lets look at that.
Definition
noun,
plural: lives
(1) A
distinctive characteristic of a living organism from
dead organism or non-living thing,
as specifically distinguished by the capacity to grow, metabolize, respond (to
stimuli), adapt, and reproduce
Ok, that sounds good.
I have that, you have that. So now
what makes me, me? My consciousness? What’s that?
Medical Definition of CONSCIOUSNESS
1
: the
totality in psychology of sensations, perceptions, ideas, attitudes, and
feelings of which an individual or a group is aware at any given time or within
a given time span <altered states of consciousness, such as
sleep, dreaming and hypnosis—Bob Gaines>
2
: waking life (as that to which one returns
after sleep, trance, or fever) in which one's normal mental powers are present <the
ether wore off and the patient regainedconsciousness>
3
: the
upper part of mental life of which the person is aware as contrasted with
unconscious processes
Sounds good to me. Just these two simple questions give
rise to a large amount of human thought.
Life and consciousness have been discussed at least since Plato and will
continue to be discussed. I suspect the
new movie coming out called “She” will also stimulate a lot of discussion about
these topics. So how do we perceive what
we call reality around us? Again many
folks have written on this subject again going back to at least Plato I’m
guessing. A good book about this is Jim
Holt’s “Why Does the World Exist?” I
have an earlier post on my review of this book.
Let me just comment
on my thoughts about reality that as far as I can tell are called either Physicalist
or Functionalist by folks who think about such stuff.
As I posted before.
We perceive what most scientist would say as our reality through our
senses. We have with technology added
devices, such as microscopes and telescopes that amplify or add to our
senses. So what we define as reality is what we
get through our senses. With these we
have developed with physics at least a description of reality that explains the
physical universe from the size of neutrons and protons up to the observable universe. With our present knowledge of physics we can
understand simple systems over this range.
We then generalize this knowledge to understand even more. What I mean by generalize is to model large systems
by what we know about physics of simple systems. A large part of science works is on understanding
larger systems. These are difficult problems
in all areas of science. Technology
takes what we know from science and makes useful stuff with this knowledge.
So we have all this data that we have obtained through
our senses and developed theories to describe the physical universe. What about consciousness ? I have yet to hear of anybody creating an
artificial conscience and that would be something that everyone would hear
about. Could anyone make a conscience
object and how would you know it is conscience?
Think of yourself. When did you
realize you were conscience? Think about
it, when did you realize that you were alive?
It would seem to be a pretty important event in your life. Can you remember it? I
can’t. Why not? I don’t know.
What’s your earliest memory?
Here’s an interesting experiment. Think Star Trek and “beaming up” or
teleportation. How would that happen?
Imagine a device that can scan your body and determine the location of every
atom in your body. So it has a map of
all the atoms in your body. It puts that
information in a computer. So are you
stored in there? Is your consciousness
there? I don’t know, no one knows that
as far as I can tell. Ok, so now we beam you to the beach in La Jolla. Is what appears on the beach you? Would
this object have your conscience? No one knows.
Do you think this is just science fiction? It’s not.
Research groups around the world are working on a variety of projects
simulating the brain. Simulating in the
largest supercomputers what we know of the human brain. People are simulating neurons and the
connection that they make to other neurons using information that we have
obtained from studying brains. If you
look at the brain it weighs about 3 pounds and has about 100 billion neurons. One group has a computer model with 10,000 neurons
with 10 million interconnection between the neurons. Comparison to results from the computer
simulation has been compared to rat’s brains results but I don’t know the
outcome. Also research groups are using
real physical circuits the model the human brain. I’ve read some about these works in the
physics trade publication Physics Today but I can’t remember the details.
So you have groups modeling the brain. Will they come up with devices that are
conscience? A good question is how would you know that they are conscience, or
even capable of becoming conscience? How would these artificial “brains” communicate to us?
Next step use an advanced "3-D printer" similar to a present
3-D laser printer only now instead of using material that present printers have
we have at our disposal all the atoms that make up your body. We load into the printer the information
about all the atoms in your body and have it
print “you” out. This is just like teleporting in star trek Is that you? Is that object alive? Is it conscience?
Interesting questions.
No comments:
Post a Comment